If you really want to kill the value of AI in your organization by 2026, what do you do first?

Correct answer: B

In summary, what does this report say?

The report positions AI as an amplifier of human impact (and not as a gadget), and forces us to redefine expected leadership when “synthesis” (i.e., the ability to generate a first level of synthesis and analysis) is almost free; concretely, the differentiation of expected leadership shifts: less “I am the person who knows everything and synthesizes best” and more “I am the person who frames the problem, asks the right questions, arbitrates, assumes the risk, gives meaning, and gets things done.”

Suggestion for the L&C team:

“Decision to Judgment” module: what I delegate to AI (analysis, options), what I don’t delegate (arbitration, responsibility, meaning). Deliverable: a personal charter “AI = co-pilot / AI = no”.

Off-piste for the L & C team:

Setting up a “shadow board”: 2 AIs give opposing recommendations; the leader must write the final decision + the risk assumed (and why).