Loading...

L’ensemble des contenus Business Digest est exclusivement réservé à nos abonnés.
Nous vous remercions de ne pas les partager.

Asking questions is the best way to gather information and establish a dialogue. But not all questions produce the same result. Do you ask thoughtful questions whose goal is to uncover facts, thoughts and feelings? 

“The scientist is not a person who gives the right answers, he is one who asks the right questions.” — Claude Lévi-Strauss 

The banal, declarative statement, “It’s cold in this room!” is a question.

True
False
Right !
Researchers like Todorov argue that most assertions in everyday life are just roundabout questions. Here you can understand a request for confirmation: “Are you cold too?” Or the question, “What can be done to warm it up?” In this sense, everything is a question. Is the question the epitome of language? That conclusion might be extreme, but keep in mind the decisive role of questioning in interpersonal relationships.
Wrong !
Researchers like Todorov argue that most assertions in everyday life are just roundabout questions. Here you can understand a request for confirmation: “Are you cold too?” Or the question, “What can be done to warm it up?” In this sense, everything is a question. Is the question the epitome of language? That conclusion might be extreme, but keep in mind the decisive role of questioning in interpersonal relationships.

Among the trilogy affirm/question/order, the question is the most difficult to pin down.

True
False
Right !
The most difficult to pin down and the richest too. Man has three fundamental behaviors (according to the researcher Benveniste): There are those who transmit information (describe the world), who ask something (question the world) and those who give orders (seek to change the world). The question is a link between an assertion and an order; but its place is unstable and unclear, since a question can hide beneath an assertion (“It’s cold in this room!”) or an order (“We’re going to lunch”). In short, questions punctuate, orient, jump-start verbal interactions. The practice of questioning is therefore a real cornerstone of dialogue.
Wrong !
The most difficult to pin down and the richest too. Man has three fundamental behaviors (according to the researcher Benveniste): There are those who transmit information (describe the world), who ask something (question the world) and those who give orders (seek to change the world). The question is a link between an assertion and an order; but its place is unstable and unclear, since a question can hide beneath an assertion (“It’s cold in this room!”) or an order (“We’re going to lunch”). In short, questions punctuate, orient, jump-start verbal interactions. The practice of questioning is therefore a real cornerstone of dialogue.

Questioning is a responsibility.

True
False
Right !
Many failures and misunderstandings are the result of unasked questions. Socrates once said, “I know you won’t believe me, but the highest form of human excellence is to question oneself and others.” Perhaps his most important contribution to Western thought is the Socratic method (asking and answering questions), based upon eliminating hypotheses. The best hypotheses are thus founded by clearly identifying and eliminating those which lead to contradictions. The method encourages people to examine their own beliefs and the validity of those beliefs, with the aim of revealing the truth behind appearances. Inspired by this centuries-old model, asking questions and formulating them carefully has become a critical skill in a complex world.
Wrong !
Many failures and misunderstandings are the result of unasked questions. Socrates once said, “I know you won’t believe me, but the highest form of human excellence is to question oneself and others.” Perhaps his most important contribution to Western thought is the Socratic method (asking and answering questions), based upon eliminating hypotheses. The best hypotheses are thus founded by clearly identifying and eliminating those which lead to contradictions. The method encourages people to examine their own beliefs and the validity of those beliefs, with the aim of revealing the truth behind appearances. Inspired by this centuries-old model, asking questions and formulating them carefully has become a critical skill in a complex world.

To question is to disturb.

True
False
Right !
A meeting that ends with the inevitable, “Do you have any questions?” generally obtains the same result: Everyone hides behind their notes. The few who take the floor often prefer to formulate an opinion and not a question. The result: The right questions always come too late, often in writing and after decisions have already been made.
Wrong !
A meeting that ends with the inevitable, “Do you have any questions?” generally obtains the same result: Everyone hides behind their notes. The few who take the floor often prefer to formulate an opinion and not a question. The result: The right questions always come too late, often in writing and after decisions have already been made.

To question is to interrogate.

True
False
Right !
In general, after you’ve asked a person two or three questions in a row, you prefer to stop, even if you don’t have all the necessary information, because you have the impression that the exchange is veering toward an interrogation. However, your view is based on a misinterpretation of politeness: By assaulting another person with questions, you feel you’re forcing them to reveal information they don’t want to offer. But other people have free will and can decide not to answer you. Your questions may help the other person express ideas, which they might not have done without your questions. Keep in mind that your requests, far from being bothersome, can be conducive to an enriching reflection or discussion.
Wrong !
In general, after you’ve asked a person two or three questions in a row, you prefer to stop, even if you don’t have all the necessary information, because you have the impression that the exchange is veering toward an interrogation. However, your view is based on a misinterpretation of politeness: By assaulting another person with questions, you feel you’re forcing them to reveal information they don’t want to offer. But other people have free will and can decide not to answer you. Your questions may help the other person express ideas, which they might not have done without your questions. Keep in mind that your requests, far from being bothersome, can be conducive to an enriching reflection or discussion.

The first thing to keep in mind to avoid any ambiguity is to start with a specific question requiring a specific answer.

True
False
Right !
Learn to choose the formulation of your questions according to your goal. Some questions are particularly effective for opening an exchange, initiating a conversation, others allow you to revive a conversation. The first thing to keep in mind when asking questions is to start with open questions, then gradually clarify by moving to more closed questions when you’re looking for more precise information. Open questions call for a developed answer. But, for example, “How?” is a concrete question that requires a structured description.
Wrong !
Learn to choose the formulation of your questions according to your goal. Some questions are particularly effective for opening an exchange, initiating a conversation, others allow you to revive a conversation. The first thing to keep in mind when asking questions is to start with open questions, then gradually clarify by moving to more closed questions when you’re looking for more precise information. Open questions call for a developed answer. But, for example, “How?” is a concrete question that requires a structured description.

A closed question calls for a concise answer, but can create tension.

True
False
Right !
Informative or specific questions – “Who?,” “What?,” “When?,” “Where?,” “How?,” “Which?” – call for a response, usually unique and factual. You may expect precise information, but the response may in fact turn out to be “undisciplined” or polluted by comments not prompted by the question, thus complicating the dialogue and its purpose.

Also be aware that this type of question, used too insistently, could turn into an interrogation. Another danger is that closed questions can lead to questions in response. Conflictual by nature, they can block any further exchange: A person answers a question with another question – defensively or to gain time. At that point, it’s better to explain that the discussion cannot move forward in this manner.
Wrong !
Informative or specific questions – “Who?,” “What?,” “When?,” “Where?,” “How?,” “Which?” – call for a response, usually unique and factual. You may expect precise information, but the response may in fact turn out to be “undisciplined” or polluted by comments not prompted by the question, thus complicating the dialogue and its purpose.

Also be aware that this type of question, used too insistently, could turn into an interrogation. Another danger is that closed questions can lead to questions in response. Conflictual by nature, they can block any further exchange: A person answers a question with another question – defensively or to gain time. At that point, it’s better to explain that the discussion cannot move forward in this manner.

The art of questioning is the art of knowing how to be informed.

True
False
Right !
Not only. If questions give access to information – it’s still necessary to ask questions and know how to clearly formulate them – the art of questioning allows you to maintain an exchange, not simply to solicit information. Questioning therefore has a regulating function which acts on the communication process, on the movement of the conversation (to deepen, accelerate, revive, change subjects, focus, clarify). This regulatory function requires three qualities: paying attention to others (there is no regulation without the ability to focus on others); demonstrating unfailing rationality (for the clarity of the method and the rigor of the statement); finally, being respectful of the objectives of the exchange (what are we looking for together in this conversation?).
Wrong !
Not only. If questions give access to information – it’s still necessary to ask questions and know how to clearly formulate them – the art of questioning allows you to maintain an exchange, not simply to solicit information. Questioning therefore has a regulating function which acts on the communication process, on the movement of the conversation (to deepen, accelerate, revive, change subjects, focus, clarify). This regulatory function requires three qualities: paying attention to others (there is no regulation without the ability to focus on others); demonstrating unfailing rationality (for the clarity of the method and the rigor of the statement); finally, being respectful of the objectives of the exchange (what are we looking for together in this conversation?).

“It doesn't seem to interest you ...” is suggestive questioning.

True
False
Right !
This is a fine example of suggestive questioning. Another example: “You've finished your work …” or “This salary increase is suitable to you …” This type of statement spurs a conversation, seeking assent without exerting too much pressure. It inspires ideas, and the other person is free to pick up on them or not. This conversational mode encourages the other person to chat, yet while it can result in meaningful responses, it may exert a hidden influence on them.

Some of the most common questions can, under certain conditions, influence the answers. And sometimes, questioning departs from its true role (satisfying a need for information and a desire to communicate) to enter into argumentation and persuasion (through the use of questions aimed at convincing), or worse, be used as weapons in the balance of power (through the use of questions aimed at conditioning).
Wrong !
This is a fine example of suggestive questioning. Another example: “You've finished your work …” or “This salary increase is suitable to you …” This type of statement spurs a conversation, seeking assent without exerting too much pressure. It inspires ideas, and the other person is free to pick up on them or not. This conversational mode encourages the other person to chat, yet while it can result in meaningful responses, it may exert a hidden influence on them.

Some of the most common questions can, under certain conditions, influence the answers. And sometimes, questioning departs from its true role (satisfying a need for information and a desire to communicate) to enter into argumentation and persuasion (through the use of questions aimed at convincing), or worse, be used as weapons in the balance of power (through the use of questions aimed at conditioning).

“What got into you?” is actually an exclamation.

True
False
Right !
By asking this question, you are attacking the integrity of the person you are talking to. This type of questioning is called a disqualifying question, weakening the other person with reproaches, but also by making them doubt themselves. Disqualifying questions call on the person you are addressing to take responsibility for something deemed unacceptable or wrong (“How can you say that?” “How do you dare present this report?”).

They defy good conscience and put the other person in a state of embarrassment – almost taking away their right to explain themselves if it’s not to defend themselves. They are tactical questions, aimed at manipulation, and result from a desire to gain the upper hand. In such cases, communication falls victim to antagonism. So not all questions are good to ask if you really want to keep the conversation going.
Wrong !
By asking this question, you are attacking the integrity of the person you are talking to. This type of questioning is called a disqualifying question, weakening the other person with reproaches, but also by making them doubt themselves. Disqualifying questions call on the person you are addressing to take responsibility for something deemed unacceptable or wrong (“How can you say that?” “How do you dare present this report?”).

They defy good conscience and put the other person in a state of embarrassment – almost taking away their right to explain themselves if it’s not to defend themselves. They are tactical questions, aimed at manipulation, and result from a desire to gain the upper hand. In such cases, communication falls victim to antagonism. So not all questions are good to ask if you really want to keep the conversation going.

Your results

/ 10

From 0 to 4 : Allo …… ! 

Oooops! Warning, your ability to motivate your team by listening first and foremost is weak, and your managerial potential is therefore similarly limited.  You must build up your motivations skills, which are especially important in times of economic and social uncertainty. Pay proper attention to what really motivates each member of your team, and have true conversation that takes this into account.  

 

From 5 to 7 : You’re not quite there yet 

Your ability to listen and motivate your team members is satisfactory.  You are able to keep your team motivated on a daily basis; however it would still be worth improving your skills. To you tend to manage things in a traditional kind of a way? You could perhaps work on improving your art of constructive conversation, among other things by paying more attention and listening.  

 

From 8 to 10 : Wow!  

You are largely capable of motivating your team by listening and of handling a variety of difficult circumstances.  Beware! Still, double check and make sure that there is no gap between what you believe should be done and what you actually do, especially by perfecting your listening skills for even more collaborative conversations!